3 ms·
I guess that’s one way to label a goal. If they can’t make the deadline, should this be backed off or canceled? FWIW it does seem like chargers are showing up a
by dahart 4y ago
I guess that’s one way to label a goal. If they can’t make the deadline, should this be backed off or canceled? FWIW it does seem like chargers are showing up all over the place.
- mimikatz 4y agoI'd vote that is a bad way to govern, I am not in Cali so I have no ability to affect this.
- OccamsMirror 4y agoOnly the impotent have the luxury of purity.
- dahart 4y agoI’m not sure I understand why, can you elaborate? Laws set standards and protect us, and we know they work even when they’re a blunt instrument. Seat belts took mandated action when lawmakers recognized that safety was more important than choice. Emissions and fuel economy standards are valuable. These are all things I agree with as a citizen and I’m glad that the government demands it of car companies. History is as likely to show this new one is as good an idea as the previous laws, and future generations will have the luxury of believing it was inevitable.
- mimikatz 4y agoBasically laws should be followed, they should be serious, they should be real. A law shouldn't be aspirational and people shouldn't go well that is a good goal to set.
- dahart 4y agoAll emissions and pollution and environmental laws are both aspirational and serious/real, so I still don’t understand your point. Why shouldn’t laws be aspirational? I disagree with that notion. Setting goals and standards is one of the biggest reasons laws exist.