> If you wanted to keep cyclists safe, you would just stay behind them if they wanted to be safe, they wouldn't go when cars are allowed to go 90km/h, side by

> If you wanted to keep cyclists safe, you would just stay behind them if they wanted to be safe, they wouldn't go when cars are allowed to go 90km/h, side by side. if you are suicidal, I don't wanna be part of your plan. > Cyclists are doing the best with an infrastructure built in favour of cars, that's so boring that is gives me nausea Americans don't understand that they are not the center of the world. Most of the bikes accidents in.my country happen far away from cities. Most of those roads are the same that 200 years ago were used only by mules and cows people didn't complain at the time when they used them with bikes, but complain now that bikes are 100x times better and roads are 100x times easier and safer. the only "new" infrastructure have been highways in the 60s of the 1900 Viale Trastevere is kinda new in Rome, it was made by Mussolini in the late 1920s that's the "infrastructure" you're talking about. It just happens that now the main users of roads are cars, get over it, they won and will keep being the most used vehicle's form factor even after the electric transition.