3 ms·
IMO software patents should be entirely abolished. If you look at patents from before computers entered the picture, a patent covered the idea + implementation.
by _fat_santa 4y ago
IMO software patents should be entirely abolished. If you look at patents from before computers entered the picture, a patent covered the idea + implementation.
Someone could create a better bucket design and patent that design, what one could not do is patent the idea of "a container that holds liquid".
But that seems to be exactly what has happened with software patents. With software, the idea is very much divorced with the implementation (I think Paul Graham or someone else said a while back that an idea by itself is worthless, it's all about the execution of the idea). It seems that with software patents is less "this is my invention, I want to protect it" and more "hey I had this cool idea, now no one can have the same idea again".
- HPsquared 4y agoIt means that, instead of incremental improvements on an idea, these can now be limited to 20 years per step.
- zmmmmm 4y agoWhich is an excellent point because it may have been reasonable when the patent system was created and for hard objects because there were natural limits on how fast innovation could happen. But software is literally only limited by our minds. Slowing down innovation to a 20 year cycle is devastating to the pace at which it can happen.