3 ms·
There's a big difference here. DALL-E (or any other similar tool) is not an artist, it is a commercial product that can produce something that might be consider
by ale42 4y ago
There's a big difference here. DALL-E (or any other similar tool) is not an artist, it is a commercial product that can produce something that might be considered art. The usage might be ok, but the product itself might not... if I paint using stolen pigments (not saying that DALL-E is alike to this), my painting would be legal, but the fact of having stolen the pigment is very illegal...
- drran 4y agoProduct of machine cannot be copyrighted. Only humans have the right to copyright something. Dall-e like kaleidoscope then. Anybody, even monkey, can generate similarly looking images using Dall-e with the same prompt. So there is two options: a) Dall-e images are without copyright. b) Original authors of work used by Dall-e can claim copyright over images generated.