4 ms·

No, it does not imply that at all.

• docmechanic 4y ago
  Obama-era Pentagon general disagrees. Care to back up your assertion? "A large question, of course, is why Congress is seemingly admitting this now, in public. After all, lawmakers are privy to classified information that the general public isn't. “It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence,” Marik von Rennenkampff, an Obama-era DoD official,\ ... "
  • ttpphd 4y ago
    I am not shocked that the journalist found an ex-DoD official with poor reading comprehension of technical language. Why does that shock you? And why do you share his incorrect read of the language?
    • docmechanic 4y ago
      Never said it shocked me. You're just making 'argument by assertion', a typical logical fallacy. A cogent reply would have explained how the quote in question did not imply the existence of UFOs created by humans, the subject of our discourse. Instead, you make an ad hominem attack on the subject matter expert. I doubt that you read the article, and I won't respond again to an insincere interlocutor.
      • docmechanic 4y ago
        "... UFOs by non-humans ..."