Everyone knows the real problem is in the funders, like the NIH. They could easily correct the problem by yanking / giving funding for "boring" activities like

Everyone knows the real problem is in the funders, like the NIH. They could easily correct the problem by yanking / giving funding for "boring" activities like proper peer review, proper fraud detection (why is all of it falling on Elizabeth Bik and short sellers? Why did the NIH not catch the beta amyloid disaster??), and maybe special funding for reproducing results. Yes, NIH created the "crisis" in the first place by only putting "shiny, complex things" on the pedestal.