5 ms·

I've written code like that for clients (and specifically executed a transition from bare metal+shell scripts to EKS for a "generic backend" module once), but I

I've written code like that for clients (and specifically executed a transition from bare metal+shell scripts to EKS for a "generic backend" module once), but I can't publish any of it for unfortunate obvious reasons. But FWIW I think it's inherent to IaC to involve a lot of copy-pasta, sometimes your best abstraction will just lead to shifting the copy-pasta from code to call-sites, which tends to be more maintainable but still. What I can recommend is to treat your modules for what they are: Public library functions. Meaning common sense advice for those applies: - Approach writing modules by actually designing an API for it. Don't treat it as a folder to dump resources in. - Make your API as small as you can get away with. - Its variables and outputs should be, whenever possible, describe a generic black box that could have its internals swapped. - Make modules composable where you can. Being able to pass around entire module instances in variables because they have clean, stable APIs is very nice. - Accept some things will inevitably leak but put in the effort to minimize them. This blog post and the book from the authors (Terraform Up & Running) has some good ideas that got me started with the basics, but there's not much written with regards to more involved usecases: https://blog.gruntwork.io/how-to-create-reusable-infrastructure-with-terraform-modules-25526d65f73d https://blog.gruntwork.io/how-to-create-reusable-infrastruct...

icedchai 4y ago
thank you. That link looks interesting!
shyn3 4y ago
I like your advice but this misses the MOAT of the cloud which is being able to utilize the IaaS/Papas they provide. For example if you are building in azure today going with SQL doesn't make sense because Cosmos and service bus/event grids handle that. This locks you into the vendor bad makes it near impossible to leave.
- icedchai 4y ago
  That's the real cost of cloud: lock in. It's cheap to get in, expensive to get out. Example: You get into data into DynamoDB, it's going to be very difficult to migrate out. Consider all your code is likely using AWS-specific APIs, unless your devs were smart enough to build some sort of abstraction. (I've only seen that done right once.)
  - shyn3 4y ago
    I don't think it makes sense to use the abstraction. The cloud is not worth it for that IMO. If you are going to do that using a traditional data center model makes more sense otherwise you can't realize the full value. Also all the providers will have different services or lack of. Even worst, you use a mix of SaaS to avoid the reliance. Better to pay the operations cost.
    - icedchai 4y ago
      As always, it depends. boto3's DynamoDB APIs, for example, feel a bit "meh." It is probably worth wrapping them just for your own sanity.
      - shyn3 4y ago
        That's a great point. I look at it from an ops perspective and not the headache the devs deal with. I see where you are coming from. Thanks for the insight.

icedchai 4y ago

thank you. That link looks interesting!

shyn3 4y ago

I like your advice but this misses the MOAT of the cloud which is being able to utilize the IaaS/Papas they provide. For example if you are building in azure today going with SQL doesn't make sense because Cosmos and service bus/event grids handle that. This locks you into the vendor bad makes it near impossible to leave.

icedchai 4y ago
That's the real cost of cloud: lock in. It's cheap to get in, expensive to get out. Example: You get into data into DynamoDB, it's going to be very difficult to migrate out. Consider all your code is likely using AWS-specific APIs, unless your devs were smart enough to build some sort of abstraction. (I've only seen that done right once.)
- shyn3 4y ago
  I don't think it makes sense to use the abstraction. The cloud is not worth it for that IMO. If you are going to do that using a traditional data center model makes more sense otherwise you can't realize the full value. Also all the providers will have different services or lack of. Even worst, you use a mix of SaaS to avoid the reliance. Better to pay the operations cost.
  - icedchai 4y ago
    As always, it depends. boto3's DynamoDB APIs, for example, feel a bit "meh." It is probably worth wrapping them just for your own sanity.
    - shyn3 4y ago
      That's a great point. I look at it from an ops perspective and not the headache the devs deal with. I see where you are coming from. Thanks for the insight.