3 ms·
Meta comment: It's pretty bold for a blog that started a year a year ago to call themselves a "news agency" and to claim to speak for the Japanese people.
by learndeeply 4y ago
Meta comment: It's pretty bold for a blog that started a year a year ago to call themselves a "news agency" and to claim to speak for the Japanese people.
- sudden_dystopia 4y agoPretty bold article in general.
- daniel-cussen 4y agoIt's pretty bold for literally any blog like any any blog wsj.com nytimes.com bloomberg.com any any blog to call itself news. Maybe aggregators. So long as it's a square joint, and there's human moderation with criterio, can't translate that word really, means judgment, but special kind. Something like independent thinking and unhackability. Like what? Like here, really. And even then it shoots its own credibility in the foot with the first word, "Hacker" in "Hacker News". Even journalists are now aware "hacker" for "cracker" is derogatory.[1] In the newsroom. In New York Times for one. Hey and it even owns hackernews.com now. That's good cred[ibility]. [1] Although "cracker" is already a slur for European Americans so it's saturated...but different. And the whole thing with slurs is it's about [thought-controlling, provoking, accusing and blaming but at any rate brutally] policing European Americans. It est [i.e. or ie] whites. Like myself. Not sure this gets flagged without me saying "flagged". Even then, who knows. Like even in court this one woman was arguing she wasn't a terrorist judge had to haul her to the curb quoting a terrorist tweet promoting genocide of whites. Even then it didn't completely close the case, just a hiccup in her tempo. That's it, nothing happens.