They are fundamentally the same problem -- profiting off of owning something fundamentally scarce that you did not produce, i.e. rent-seeking. When the taxes ar

They are fundamentally the same problem -- profiting off of owning something fundamentally scarce that you did not produce, i.e. rent-seeking. When the taxes are proportional to the most productive use of the land you own it is less profitable or sustainable to manipulate the housing market. The strictest Georgist philosophy would hold if you happened to homestead in the heart of Manhattan your family will eventually have to choose between paying the price for holding that piece of land hostage from the rest of society or letting someone else make use of it. In practice, places like Denmark and Estonia make exemptions for owner-occupied dwellings.