I agree, and it’s the same with Python. If you start with static, type-safe first, then Python’s flexibility ends up being so horribly convoluted that you avoid

I agree, and it’s the same with Python. If you start with static, type-safe first, then Python’s flexibility ends up being so horribly convoluted that you avoid it in favor of simpler constructs. **kwargs? Massive union types? Super flexible dicts? Rather not! I’ll define 50 strongly typed constructs over having to run my code through 50 times to catch all the runtime bugs.