5 ms·
Maybe I’m slow here, but the authors said they couldn’t get a molecular ion in mass spec, but the ESR shows an electron in the center like would be expected for
by selimthegrim 4y ago
Maybe I’m slow here, but the authors said they couldn’t get a molecular ion in mass spec, but the ESR shows an electron in the center like would be expected for an anion? Is that a radical? Did they mean they couldn’t get a cation?
- devilbunny 4y agoMass spec depends on the ion surviving the passage through an electron beam. They can't get a molecular ion because it blows apart in the process - they just get the fragments. Normally, you get the big fragments and at least some of the whole molecule ions. Not here. Too unstable. ESR is more gentle.
- s0rce 4y agoNot all mass spec use an electron beam (in fact I think most do not), one of the most common for analyzing organic molecules uses electro-spray ionization (ESI) and it is relatively gently but I assume you are generally correct in that they couldn't get the whole molecule to fly, it either didn't ionize or fragmented.
- devilbunny 4y agoThank you. It's been a good while since I studied how mass spec actually works. And the ones we used were not new at the time (they were from a local company that donated their older machines to my university). Maybe I only remember how ours worked. The organic chem students didn't get to use the nice computerized FFT NMR machine that was in the basement - that was for analytical chem students and research projects. No, the NMR's you got to use in organic just scanned each frequency and had a plotter that traced your result on paper. I did think that the single peak on both fluorine and carbon NMR was pretty cool.