I get what you're saying and I agree but I also think you misinterpreted the parent comment. > You still rather have it and not need it than need it and not ha

I get what you're saying and I agree but I also think you misinterpreted the parent comment. > You still rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. Given the context of the fire extinguisher, "it" in this case is a useful (possibly critical), not-commonly-needed feature, rather than a collection of data.