> For something to stand the test of time, it has to be lost. I agree. Some of the people quoted in the article advocated writing on a monumental scale in orde

> For something to stand the test of time, it has to be lost. I agree. Some of the people quoted in the article advocated writing on a monumental scale in order to preserve it, but I don't think that gives particularly good odds of preservation. To add to the examples you cite, the Georgia Guidestones were pretty much a modern experiment in preservation through monumentalism; they painted a monumental target on their backs right away, and ultimately ended up being destroyed this year. The way to go is probably massive replication in a compact, durable medium.