3 ms·
Would you be able to leverage singer taps / targets? https://www.singer.io https://www.singer.io
by programmarchy 4y ago
Would you be able to leverage singer taps / targets?
https://www.singer.io https://www.singer.io
- gthompson1 4y agoOh this is very interesting, I had never heard of this. Yeh I could potentially use this. I do think using a third party library or provider makes sense to massively expand the input / output options. Seems like there is a standard schema for the different tap configs that I could pull and wrap in UI forms in a generalized fashion. I don't know if you think these are fair comment about the state of the project? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBrSOPNEg-g&ab_channel=Restack https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBrSOPNEg-g&ab_channel=Resta...
- programmarchy 4y agoI actually use Stitch so I don’t have to host orchestration, which is how I came to know about Singer in the first place. It’s true that Stitch got acquired by Talend, but Singer seems independent enough. I don’t understand why Stitch would “abandon” Singer. They’re a sponsor, and seems like they have an incentive to keep that ball rolling. Their bread and butter seems to be hosting orchestration, so more taps means more customers for them. There’s other stakeholders in Singer, too, like Meltano, and all the self-hosters. The GitHub activity seems robust to me, but I don’t really have any in depth knowledge about the Singer community. Saying it’s “dying” doesn’t seem accurate, though.