I hear you. In this case why even have an HQ in California? Why not become fully remote and hire from a range of compatible timezones? I'm just saying that suc

I hear you. In this case why even have an HQ in California? Why not become fully remote and hire from a range of compatible timezones? I'm just saying that such a fully remote company could hire "average talent" 2-3 times cheaper than its counterpart headquartered in an expensive area. That's clearly a competitive advantage. I'm just saying that being remote also gives an edge for hiring average talent, not only top talent.