> But it did more harm than good I think, as electric bikes became associated with a government subsidy for the rich. Ultimately the question is: did the elect

> But it did more harm than good I think, as electric bikes became associated with a government subsidy for the rich. Ultimately the question is: did the electric bike program meet its goals? If one of the goals was to improve access to transportation for the poor, it sounds like it fell short. If the primary goal was to reduce the use of cars, it may have still been a success. (That said, I do question the commitment of those who had the money but choose not to until there was a subsidy.)