> The Big Apple's experiment "leaves the EU in the dust" because it uses "active" ISA [intelligent speed assistance], which forcibly slows vehicles, versus "pas

> The Big Apple's experiment "leaves the EU in the dust" because it uses "active" ISA [intelligent speed assistance], which forcibly slows vehicles, versus "passive" ISA, which tells drivers to hit the brakes, per TNW, a tech website owned by the Financial Times. Holy shit! Definitely of many minds myself. Overall the goal is very good, and it is so frustrating seeing people going way too fast. Particularly in neighborhoods, which like a challenging place to add ISA everywhere. On the other hand here in DC there's a number of corridors where driving the speed limit would be basically unsafe, way lower than the flow of traffic. And in general I just don't like seeing ever expanding computerized control over the world. > In July, the European Union mandated its use in new models of vehicles; in 2024, it'll be compulsory in all new cars sold there.