4 ms·
I agree, but in this post, the author says: > With a little effort, the makers of The Publisher’s digital incarnation could have one-upped the printed book by
by 8ig8 15y ago
I agree, but in this post, the author says:
> With a little effort, the makers of The Publisher’s digital incarnation could have one-upped the printed book by positioning these photographs to accompany relevant bits of Brinkley’s text, illustrating, e.g., a description of Henry Luce’s childhood with a photo of Luce as a toddler.
I don't know anything about typesetting, but this specific example seems difficult to automate with software. A human would need to decide where best to place these photos.
Again, a guess, but it seems that this book started life in a pre-electronic book production process. To get it right would require more manual effort for the e-book.
Just like websites are evolving to be adaptive/responsive, I think book production will follow. We're just not there yet. Websites are still being launched today that are close to impossible to read on a mobile phone.
- wtallis 15y agoIn LaTeX, switching between putting all the figures on their own page or putting them inline takes the equivalent of an #ifdef. It's really easy, and doesn't require any special knowledge of typesetting. Remember, TeX started out with the goal of being able to automate the typesetting of a very large, very complicated multi-volume book (The Art of Computer Programming). Novels are almost too easy, and adding a few pictures to a biography is mostly trivial.