3 ms·
> Apperantly he started the whistleblowing process before any Musk involvement with twitter. According to his lawyer as reported by someone on Twitter. IIRC,
by tablespoon 4y ago
> Apperantly he started the whistleblowing process before any Musk involvement with twitter.
According to his lawyer as reported by someone on Twitter. IIRC, lawyers make statements that guilty clients are innocent all the time.
If he was working with Musk help him wiggle out of the Twitter deal, it would fatally undermine the goal for to come out publicly about the relationship. I'm skeptical unless they can provide verifiable 3rd party evidence (e.g. some document filed before the deal).
- sp332 4y agoLinking to a Twitter thread is a little indirect, but Kim Zetter is a reporter on the infosec beat, and if you scroll up, you can see the link to the CNN article she's discussing. Also here's a video that includes the lawyer saying it out loud. https://mobile.twitter.com/donie/status/1562020176278716416 https://mobile.twitter.com/donie/status/1562020176278716416 (@donie is the first person to talk in the video.)
- Larrikin 4y agoSo instead of taking a statement from the lawyer you think it makes more sense to wildly speculate and make things up? The burden of proof falls on the other side now to prove the whistle blowing started after Musk.
- Arainach 4y agoA statement from a lawyer saying "this is older" isn't evidence. Until the lawyer shows an example of any form of whistleblowing predating Musk, this is still on them.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]