2 ms·
This is not a constructive approach to fight child abuse. Such scanning is just a pretense for the state to be able to access private communications and it need
by raxxorraxor 4y ago
This is not a constructive approach to fight child abuse. Such scanning is just a pretense for the state to be able to access private communications and it needs to be stopped right in its infancy. States accessing too much information has been a large detriment on society as it is and those responsible need to be deprived of office and responsibility.
Child abuse needs the help of people invested in children to detect instances of abuse. Internet surveillance can only do so much. The best approach is to delete any content immediately to not let it spread. This is done pretty much anywhere, you won't even need legislation. Perhaps connection info might help authorities, but I guess most perpetrators will take that into consideration as well.
- _8j50 4y agoThen get proper inhumane punishment as a deterrent? You cannot have tech that enables harmful content and refuse to all measures to deter harmful content. What people invested in children? Some guy in the backwoods of nowhere takes abusive pictures who will know other than tech companies? Delete the content so it doesn't spread in the mean time the child gets no help? Is that your answer? I don't want them to spy on our private content, in every scenario other than this one I agree with you 100% i am very much against government and corporate surveillance and support e2e but, mine and your right to privacy does not supersede the rights of the most innocent and defenseless members of society to be safe and protected from harm. You want to keep privacy then join me in supporting inhumane punishment for child predators. The deterrent aspect of unthinkably horrible punishment is enough to say there is no need for drastic measures like spying on everyone's pictures. You can't have it both ways.