But this model and your strategy makes dissent necessary in the first place. To such a degree that the content of any opposing view is secondary compared to the

But this model and your strategy makes dissent necessary in the first place. To such a degree that the content of any opposing view is secondary compared to the mere existence of dissent as there is a guarantee that you will be wrong when enforcing consensus at some point. The categorical imperative would only forbid the people of Authorityville to spread chaos in Consensusland. It has no intrinsic contradiction as it is not a strategy for conflict resolution and you would need to adhere to it in dominant and not dominant positions. There are just some wrong premises for misinformation. Misinformation is fought best with free information. There are untrue statements about the economics of misinformation and that it would win against free information because it is easier to produce. I believe this is empirically wrong and has lead us to wrong conclusion who best to combat it. And this will result in less ability to form consensus and also less trust.