3 ms·
You are playing devil's advocate against the current legal situation. I don't agree, but fine. But you're responding to the suggestion to make a legal change, t
by sverhagen 4y ago
You are playing devil's advocate against the current legal situation. I don't agree, but fine. But you're responding to the suggestion to make a legal change, this legal change presumably would put a liability on these kinds of false positives too. One of the two could still have stiffer sanctions, and cause Google to prefer the other, but the idea is at least that this choice wouldn't be that obvious anymore.
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoI agree with you. I’m arguing one could likely get Google to back a reasonable proposal.