3 ms·
Well, taking a photo of just the groin, for non-medical reasons would be kind of weird. Taking a photo of the whole baby, e.g. in bath is perfectly normal, eve
by 988747 4y ago
Well, taking a photo of just the groin, for non-medical reasons would be kind of weird. Taking a photo of the whole baby, e.g. in bath is perfectly normal, even if it also shows the groin.
- xgbi 4y agoMy son (3 at the time) had phimosis, I took a few pictures of it when a friend doctor asked to see what it was. I sent the pics to him for advice and then we consulted officially to get a prescription for a cream when je told me it was fixable (to dr: it wasn’t entirely but it helped). I hope I didn’t overstep some kind of bullshit law where I can’t take pictures for medical advice.. this is ridiculous, and I’m happy that I’m not pushing my pics automatically to google, I might have been banned? I still have the pics somewhere on my phone, probably, amongst others where he’s naked when he was messing with foam in the bath or playing in the garden with water in summer. Isn’t this like 90% of parents?! I feel that this whole CSAM is a new obsession of phone actors because they feel there’s norhing else they can innovate on.
- 988747 4y agoBut that WAS a medical reason...
- checker659 4y agoI'm not saying taking photos of your child's groin is normal. But, whatever the reason may be, a father is allowed to do so (unless the law of the land explicitly prohibits such as thing).