if the only evidence of any supposed crime that has occurred exists purely as bits on a digital storage device, it's hard to claim that crime was worthy of any

if the only evidence of any supposed crime that has occurred exists purely as bits on a digital storage device, it's hard to claim that crime was worthy of any sort of prosecution to begin with. What, really? How about when it's a photo on a digital device? Yes, yes, they're fakable. But other evidence may not exist, or may not be findable without the knowledge embodied in that photo.