4 ms·
> I didn't even read the article, so there's that. Still not an excuse for being lazy. Lol, the irony in that sentence did make me chuckle. I mean if you have
by ProAm 4y ago
> I didn't even read the article, so there's that. Still not an excuse for being lazy.
Lol, the irony in that sentence did make me chuckle. I mean if you have a background in film (production, etc...) and didn't read the article Im not sure why you commented in the first place? HN was always a place for good discussion, usually about the posted article and (to me which doesnt really matter) the article was very clear. But in the same breathe every article is never meant for every person so maybe its just that.
- dylan604 4y agoBecause I've read articles like this multiple times. These things pop up from time to time, just like common articles/themes pop up here on HN. From the discussions on how Ozark is blue, the battle scene in GoT (yes, it's HBO) was too dark, the action movie with one of the Chrises was orange, etc. It's all just a giving of an opinion on someone else's art. Why in the world did Van Gogh make Starry Night blue? Why is there a wedge shape in DaVinci's Last Supper. It's a level of bloviating.
- ProAm 4y agoWhich is a fair assumption but makes for poor discussion on a site that tries to have meaningful discussion. We're not reddit.
- dylan604 4y agoHonestly, I think that my contribution stating that having imagery as example of what is being discussed directly within the article is much more relevant than someone trying to play content police on this site. We all like different things, so you do you
- ProAm 4y ago> We all like different things, so you do you I 100% agree which is why I started with that article probably isn't for you. Especially since you didn't read it but posted as if you had. I get it, no one is the seer of all things I just thought the article was accurate, easy to read and explained the point well. Absolutely to each their own.