3 ms·
This case establishes that the copy in question was in fact a "copy" as defined by the copyright act, but the infringement was due to the disposition of the par
by jacobsievers 4y ago
This case establishes that the copy in question was in fact a "copy" as defined by the copyright act, but the infringement was due to the disposition of the parties' rights via a license - not inherent to the copyright. This ruling is highly specific to the case.