It would be more inconvenient, but at the same time it would feel more self-consistent. It you'd want to limit alcohol consumption (just an example), you don't

It would be more inconvenient, but at the same time it would feel more self-consistent. It you'd want to limit alcohol consumption (just an example), you don't want to ban tequila but allow gin for instance. You can say ban anything with more than 15% alcohol by volume -- that would feel harsh but more fair. I'm really not rationalizing, for me and some others there needs to be a perceived fairness in the restrictions.