I dunno. I can imagine any of those points being the subject of a civil suit and for someone to win damages, for e.g. psychological harm. The parts talking abou

I dunno. I can imagine any of those points being the subject of a civil suit and for someone to win damages, for e.g. psychological harm. The parts talking about “effect” instead of intent are of questionable enforceability - how can I agree not to cause an unanticipated effect on a third party? I cannot. But having said that, I can be asked to account for effects that a “reasonable person” would anticipate, so there’s that. These are all things that someone could sue over (especially in California) and so they’re wanting to place the responsibility on the artist and not their tools.