> The license seems a bit ambiguous. $49 for a "one user license", I hope that really means "one developer"? > But one developer can build an app used by many u

> The license seems a bit ambiguous. $49 for a "one user license", I hope that really means "one developer"? > But one developer can build an app used by many users. So I suppose you are oddly pressured into buying the more expensive license because you probably have more than one "user"? It clearly says "Use in multiple websites" under both licenses, so it's talking about devs not users (like most such licenses).