3 ms·
It's a valid option, but an alternative is to stay in the country and try to lobby and advocate for change within the country. There is a certain point where l
by insightcheck 4y ago
It's a valid option, but an alternative is to stay in the country and try to lobby and advocate for change within the country.
There is a certain point where lobbying and advocacy can be futile, and emigration is a stronger option. For example, in Venezuela's recent history, it went from a prosperous country to an economically devastated one, and the population fell in the 2010s as a result [0].
However, Belgium is in a much better place in terms of political stability. It's far more likely that advocacy can be effective. However, it takes a lot of time, and you can give up a lot of potential earnings by staying and trying to advocate. If one has an attachment to a country, especially as a citizen, one can find a lot of value in trying to introduce reforms instead of emigrating.
[0] https://www.google.com/search?q=Venezuela+population+over+time&client=safari&ved=0ahUKEwiIodeQ6tr5AhVuATQIHYcRAfwQ4dUDCAw&oq=Venezuela+population+over+time&sclient=gws-wiz https://www.google.com/search?q=Venezuela+population+over+ti...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]