3 ms·
I only watched a few seconds, but there is a minor difference between a DAW and a sequencer. This looks like MIDI, and I didn't hear any real sounds, so I would
by Maursault 4y ago
I only watched a few seconds, but there is a minor difference between a DAW and a sequencer. This looks like MIDI, and I didn't hear any real sounds, so I would call it a sequencer. Maybe there is actual recorded sounds later in the video?
Still nutty amazing.
- consumer451 4y agoThe demo song plays a decent version of Take on Me by Aha! [0] I have not enabled macros in an xlsx for years, but this was worth opening in safe place. It really is a functional basic sequencer. So freaking cool! But I don't yet see the option for recording audio, so maybe not a DAW. But it does export an Ableton file. So cool. [0] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18OkY-KUU6ewZOC1u-Djni53_D7gR3ma_ https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/18OkY-KUU6ewZOC1u-Djn...
- gizajob 4y agoPersonally I prefer sequencer because that's what they were called back in the day. DAW to my British ears seems like a clunky Americanism that's sounds wrong both as D.A.W. and rhyming with door.