2 ms·
This seems fine to me. The newer table format is better. It'll break a bunch of stuff that can't be rebuilt from source. Not sympathetic to proprietary software
by JonChesterfield 4y ago
This seems fine to me. The newer table format is better. It'll break a bunch of stuff that can't be rebuilt from source. Not sympathetic to proprietary software dynamically linked against glibc.
Contrast with rpath, which was repurposed without change of name to set runpath, with obnoxiously different semantics and a new linker flag for 'by rpath I actually meant rpath, not runpath' as something that actively wastes my time on a roughly monthly basis.