> That is not true, given that I was replying to you, and you were replying to the person that said _this_. a) Oops! Not sure why I thought that diognesofsinop

> That is not true, given that I was replying to you, and you were replying to the person that said _this_. a) Oops! Not sure why I thought that diognesofsinope's comment and your comment were written by the same person, my bad. b) You've either made the same mistake I did or you've excellently satirised my mistake, as you were replying not to me but to somebody else :P So fair enough, sorry I thought your comment that I replied to was the owner of the original belief that salaries + pensions = enough currently, and then expanding on that belief.