4 ms·
Its a shame that one aspect of displaying movies (24 fps!) has gotten worse over time. Motion. I say motion is quite important. CRT was better than Plasma eve
by bni 4y ago
Its a shame that one aspect of displaying movies (24 fps!) has gotten worse over time.
Motion. I say motion is quite important.
CRT was better than Plasma even though Plasma was quite good.
LCD is basically PC monitor technology and it uses sample and hold, totally unsuitable for movie motion.
OLED, while great in other ways, 24p-motion still sucks, its easily the worst thing about the technology.
What technology will have all the modern good stuff and have CRT/Plasma like motion?
- k4rli 4y agoLG OLEDs with dejudder and other smoothing options (some call it soap-opera effect) is very nice in my opinion. Really makes the most of 120hz panel. Some artifacts exist when watching racing on some particular tracks, but other than that it works perfectly.
- redox99 4y agoTo be fair 24fps shouldn't exist. If you want low framerate content it should be 30fps.
- bni 4y agoAlmost every movie and TV series ever made in the US is 24p. As for future content, I see no one seriously trying to change this.