3 ms·
Well, I think what should change is people browsers. Brave blocks ads and fingerprinting by default. Funny enough, the "easy Privacy" list is suspiciously not f
by berry_sortoro 4y ago
Well, I think what should change is people browsers. Brave blocks ads and fingerprinting by default. Funny enough, the "easy Privacy" list is suspiciously not found in the default filter lists.
There is a Firefox fork that comes with uBlock Origin by default. There is Blockada for Android that blocks ads (and trackers I assume) system-wide not just in browser. But I think it's functionality is limited as it just uses a virtual "VPN" to block things. I think it's like a hosts file that redirects a bunch of ips to localhost so they never get loaded.
It's kind of silly to demand websites to change. What needs to change is things on the user's end. If these trackers were blocked by 90% of users, they would probably consider not using them and wasting time on money on the effort of maintaining that shit. And it would apply not only to nonprofits, but to the entire internet. They need to be FORCED to change, everything else is silly. Like this "do not track" BS that asks websites nicely to not track you, and they can decide (most do) to do not give a fuck about your setting and track you anyway.
- Schroedingersat 4y ago> It's kind of silly to demand websites to change We should just treat it as what it is, which is stalking and harassment, and arrest anyone making or installing the trackers.