4 ms·
It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects" Why would it matt
by wyldfire 4y ago
It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"
Why would it matter where it's held?
- runjake 4y agoBecause: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]