> I mean sterilizing immunity through infection is now known (through many thousands of documented re-infections and likely hundreds of millions) to be both irr

> I mean sterilizing immunity through infection is now known (through many thousands of documented re-infections and likely hundreds of millions) to be both irresponsible and a failure. Infection is documented at being more effective at protecting you from reinfection and from having serious complications from a subsequent infection. Let's not pretend that the Great Barrington Declaration was necessarily wrong, given the suffering supply chain disruptions are now causing, not to mention the excess deaths from untreated conditions and increases in substance abuse. Only hindsight will give us a proper understanding of which choices were better.