3 ms·
It's ironic because it's an upfront inconvenience to read what is ostensibly an article critical of how consumers are being inconvenienced. I'm not reading you
by fein 4y ago
It's ironic because it's an upfront inconvenience to read what is ostensibly an article critical of how consumers are being inconvenienced.
I'm not reading your site if you paywall it. There are too many other free resources that are just as good if not better.
- brasic 4y agoAt the risk of belaboring my point, even if what you say is true this attitude is a root cause of this unfortunate situation. Good journalism isn’t fungible — it costs money to produce. When we actively choose to not pay for media, we have no one but ourselves to blame for the awful biased or clickbait junk that results.
- fein 4y agoWe are on a discussion board. I'm not going to pay for every paywall to access every article, and if a journalist wants me to read and discuss their article, it needs to not be paywalled. You could say that posting a paywalled article on a discussion board is just an ad for paywall subs.