3 ms·

Mass inoculation with a new type of vaccine that behaved very differently than the science hypothesized is also a very simple explanation. I don't really think

Mass inoculation with a new type of vaccine that behaved very differently than the science hypothesized is also a very simple explanation. I don't really think anyone here has the ability or expertise to judge which is more fitting. For what it's worth, the fact circulatory issues is mentioned in the article should ring alarm bells for COVID vaccines being a potential cause. We just found out recently the prevalence of myocarditis among teenage boys that get the vaccine is extremely high compared to what was expected.

tchalla 4y ago
It’s not a “simple” explanation if you take some time to understand how vaccine works. Just because there’s a side effect form vaccine doesn’t mean that the vaccine isn’t the best option. Your thought process is classic example of zero risk bias.
- zbdngkhab 4y ago
  If it's not a simple explanation why did vaccine companies need absolving of any liability by govts? So safe they need to avoid liability? So safe many of the vaccines had complication rates far higher than any flu vaccine in history? Look I'm glad we had the vaccines so quickly. Trump pushing them through regulation was extremely good for man kind and we have all benefited. But stop acting like there is no risk.
  - DanBC 4y ago
    > why did vaccine companies need absolving of any liability by govts? We know some people will be harmed by vaccination. Despite that, we need to vaccinate as many people as possible. Because of that, we make it easy for people who've been harmed to claim compensation from a government and industry backed fund, rather than force those harmed people to go through the courts against multi-billion dollar companies with very expensive lawyers.
    - realreality 4y ago
      Congress actually made it more difficult to receive compensation for a COVID vaccine injury. Despite thousands of reports of injuries, including death, I don’t think anybody has been compensated. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10584 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10584
- itsthemmrvax 4y ago
gus_massa 4y ago
> that behaved very differently than the science hypothesized Can you give more details about that part? IIRC it worked as intended.
- uwagar 4y ago
  if they did countries wouldnt ban vaccines being used for < 18 or < 40 etc.

tchalla 4y ago

It’s not a “simple” explanation if you take some time to understand how vaccine works. Just because there’s a side effect form vaccine doesn’t mean that the vaccine isn’t the best option. Your thought process is classic example of zero risk bias.

zbdngkhab 4y ago
If it's not a simple explanation why did vaccine companies need absolving of any liability by govts? So safe they need to avoid liability? So safe many of the vaccines had complication rates far higher than any flu vaccine in history? Look I'm glad we had the vaccines so quickly. Trump pushing them through regulation was extremely good for man kind and we have all benefited. But stop acting like there is no risk.
- DanBC 4y ago
  > why did vaccine companies need absolving of any liability by govts? We know some people will be harmed by vaccination. Despite that, we need to vaccinate as many people as possible. Because of that, we make it easy for people who've been harmed to claim compensation from a government and industry backed fund, rather than force those harmed people to go through the courts against multi-billion dollar companies with very expensive lawyers.
  - realreality 4y ago
    Congress actually made it more difficult to receive compensation for a COVID vaccine injury. Despite thousands of reports of injuries, including death, I don’t think anybody has been compensated. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10584 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10584
itsthemmrvax 4y ago

gus_massa 4y ago

> that behaved very differently than the science hypothesized Can you give more details about that part? IIRC it worked as intended.

uwagar 4y ago
if they did countries wouldnt ban vaccines being used for < 18 or < 40 etc.