4 ms·
As much as the evangelicals of America screw with the rest of the world in their quest for purity, the better answer seems to be: How do you know those nudes a
by tehbeard 4y ago
As much as the evangelicals of America screw with the rest of the world in their quest for purity, the better answer seems to be:
How do you know those nudes are taken consensually? And what's your liability for developing ("reproducing") them?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- anon_123g987 4y agoWhy would you assume a crime by default? The presumption of innocence is only a slogan in the US, just like the above mentioned secularity. Look what happened with the guy in this post. You can't even take a photo of your own kid.
- tehbeard 4y agoThe discussion was around prints of naked adults and why stores might have policies to not develop those. I offered an alternative reason based on the legal landscape rather than a cultural one. > You can't even take a photo of your own kid. You missed the part where we're discussing a sub-topic off that story, someone's experience working in a photo store, and the policies in place there. > Why would you assume a crime by default? I assume you mean "you" as in a photo store that finds such negatives in a job order, and not me directly? Because as I said, your liability or even reputation if this isn't from something legal, is not worth the profit made.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]