3 ms·
Not sure I'd agree. It was very public, very much reverted and very much a demonstration of the context of the internet. Not to mention a very easily verifiable
by rob_c 4y ago
Not sure I'd agree. It was very public, very much reverted and very much a demonstration of the context of the internet. Not to mention a very easily verifiable proof, if people picked up the textbooks and noticed the subtle mistake.
- epgui 4y agoHe literally defaced a public good, and this cost the intervention of more sensible adults. A small cost, but still.