I wonder if critics have actually read the book. There's quite a bit about Jobs' actual work and you get quite a bit of insight into what he did and how he went

I wonder if critics have actually read the book. There's quite a bit about Jobs' actual work and you get quite a bit of insight into what he did and how he went about it. Gladwell is quite capable of spinning some idiotic theory on his own. You can't blame Isaacson for his shortcomings.