3 ms·
I would hate this, and probably instantly bail out of any flow that tried to force it on me. Being able to receive mail on an address should not necessarily im
by stormbrew 4y ago
I would hate this, and probably instantly bail out of any flow that tried to force it on me.
Being able to receive mail on an address should not necessarily imply a capability to send from it. This scheme rules out many actual or potential schemes for email anonymity, especially in a world where very little email is still transactional relatively speaking.
I do not give (almost) any website an address I send normal email from, nor do I want to. And my default configured client for mailto:, if I even have one on the device I'm using, is not going to be set to the single use mail I want to sign up with.
- cuteboy19 4y ago$Work does not allow outgoing (out of domain) emails but *Requires* signup to a bunch of websites for stuff like provident fund management and stock compensation. This kind of workflow is not possible for those cases They are exchanging inconvenience for lack of functionality