Two quick responses: > NatGas has reduced CO2 by 2X more than wind Wind produces no CO2. If you mean 'so far', that need came from heel-dragging. Nat gas prod

Two quick responses: > NatGas has reduced CO2 by 2X more than wind Wind produces no CO2. If you mean 'so far', that need came from heel-dragging. Nat gas produces much more CO2 than we can live with - which is none. > It's cheaper So's death. Anyway, no, nat gas must be mined, transported, and burned efficiently. Wind electricity is simply used without conversion. >