> “technology that could plausibly lead to AGI” My AI prof joked, I think, that it was "things that don't work yet" - clearly only a humanlike AI could do OCR.

> “technology that could plausibly lead to AGI” My AI prof joked, I think, that it was "things that don't work yet" - clearly only a humanlike AI could do OCR... until it started working, etc. But I actually think your hypothetically proposed definition fits the history even better.