3 ms·

> Person loses access to modern technology, is deported, would be unable to reach anyone once deported, and would never be allowed to return. So this person sh

> Person loses access to modern technology, is deported, would be unable to reach anyone once deported, and would never be allowed to return. So this person should get a penalty which in some ways is more severe than what murderers get? > No, blaming victim is obviously irrational. Okay, but I mean, if I publish my own name and address in a public space, and then someone else who doesn't like me takes that information and republishes it in a manner I disapprove of, is that person still a doxer? That's an extreme example but doxing almost never involves information which is not already publicly accessible to someone stubborn enough. It just involves following threads, correlating information, using public databases, etc.

O__________O 4y ago
>> So this person should get a penalty which in some ways is more severe than what murderers get? Being deported is way more humane than imprisonments. Personally, to me, being controlled than governments, corporations, etc logging my identity and any other information as they want is from of control I neither agreed to, nor would and would happily deport myself to a country than did not. >> if I publish my own name and address in a public space, and then someone else who doesn't like me takes that information and republishes it in a manner I disapprove of That would not be possible, at least in a significant way; any directly or indirectly identifiable information digitally published would require approval and would be revocable. ___ Again, might point is two parts: (1) people would never agree to this; (2) but if they did, there is nothing I am aware of the would make it impossible.