4 ms·

Based on your own standard, I'm wondering why people should take you seriously when you use terms like 'rabid'.

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• jacknews 4y ago
  • jubalfh 4y ago
    …a good answer from an odious twerp.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • jacknews 4y ago
      I wouldn't usually bother, but this has a distinct style. Could it be ... the author, as a sock? Maybe it's a different belicose bald brit.
• psd1 4y ago
  I don't agree with GP that naysayers might be "rabid" but I certainly know someone who was bitten by a bat(coin). "Rabid" is bang-on for at least some people. It's relevant and non-hypocritical. It may not be the best comment, but neither was yours.
• Brian_K_White 4y ago
  Some people are in fact rabid, and the comment is addressing only them by definition. It stands up to scrutiny.