I just read the paper. The authors actually make no claim about the reality of the wave function, so disregard anything I said above (which is still true, but n

I just read the paper. The authors actually make no claim about the reality of the wave function, so disregard anything I said above (which is still true, but not relevant). However, they do claim to have disproven the statistical interpretation of QM. This, however, is impossible: It can't be disproven from within QM, as all it says is the following: "We have no idea what happens when performing individual measurements. However, let me tell you what you'll see when you repeat the experiment often enough." All the authors have shown is that their λ mechanism is flawed.