> it provides easy cover for opportunists to exploit it I’ve always thought the opposite is true. A set of rules is bound to be gamed. More rules create more o

> it provides easy cover for opportunists to exploit it I’ve always thought the opposite is true. A set of rules is bound to be gamed. More rules create more opportunities to exploit (regulation only benefits leechers). When rules are global, profit of exploitation is greater. Therefore, there are more exploiters and exploits. In anarchy, the extent to which a set of rules apply is limited. Therefore, there is less profit from exploitation, and in turn, there are less exploiters.