12 ms·
Of course, it's all preference, I'm not making a case to say it's objectively bad, just I find it inferior. The monitor is a ultrawide LG that works perfectly
by lastangryman 4y ago
Of course, it's all preference, I'm not making a case to say it's objectively bad, just I find it inferior.
The monitor is a ultrawide LG that works perfectly on windows. A Google for "blurry text external monitor MacBook Pro" turns up many people with the same issue (edit: it's a 1440p monitor)
Thanks for the finder tip, that will help.
- frou_dh 4y ago> I'm not making a case to say it's objectively bad, just I find it inferior. That's good, because usually in this kind of debate there's an undercurrent of "I've been using X for decades (and so know it inside out). When I try Y, anything that differs from X is objectively wrong"
- account-5 4y agoWhich is generally all the Mac os just works statements are in my experience.
- Darthy 4y agoMaybe you're refering to subpixel rendering, which Windows still has, but has ben phased out on Mac with the introduction of retina displays? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpixel_rendering#OS_X https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpixel_rendering#OS_X
- cassianoleal 4y agoI have an LG ultrawide with native res 3840x1600. Text is very blurry at that resolution though, so I use SwitchRes X to turn it down to the highest HiDPI resolution and it looks great. I agree that it shouldn't be this way though, I'd have preferred to set the native res and be done with.